Forum Québec

Virgile a écrit :Bon toi le gauchsite, tu te calmes hein.

Mark a écrit :

Virgile a écrit :Bon toi le gauchsite, tu te calmes hein.

Chuuut, mécréant !

Toi qui me connais, mon bon Virgile, dis-leur que je suis un effroyable et épouvantable droitard !

Mark a écrit :J'avais oublié, tu es le Coryphée des thuriféraires de la bonne vieille Droite de Papa, articulée autour de la dichotomie entre castes instruites et tourbe prolétarienne, soumise et corvéable à souhait ; caractérisée par son teint blanchillon et son impérialisme victorien, proche de la noblesse terrienne, élitiste, et bien entendu antisémite...

Virgile a écrit :Nein.

Ta droite est une droite de pacotille.

Rien avoir avec la bonne vielle droite classique dite également "droite dure", intégriste (Mgr Lefebvre & cie), contre-révolutionnaire, antiparlementariste.

Quels sont tes maîtres à penser ? Si ce ne sont pas les Joseph de Maistre, Charles Maurras, Antoine de Rivarol, tu n'es pas le bienvenue dans notre grande famille réactionnaire.

You are a

Social Liberal
(80% permissive)

and an...

Economic Conservative
(80% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Libertarian


You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness.

Explanation Of Results

We wanted to get beyond the two catch-alls of American politics, the Democratic and Republican parties, and see where people actually stand. Parties can bring together people with marginally differing values and make collective action easier. But party platforms can misrepresent their constituents, and blind loyalty to a party can convince individuals to harbor inconsistent views.

he goal of this test was to exactly classify your personal politics, without the traditional labels. We avoided the edgy party issues and focused on fundamental values. Your score is a measure of what you believe in, economically and socially.


Higher permissiveness, on either axis, indicates a "live and let live" philosophy. Of course, we're almost conditioned in America, "Land of the Free", to think positively of such a philosophy. But practically speaking, permissiviness (or its opposite, regulation) can create any number of outcomes:

For example, on the economic axis, a highly permissive system, like the American system of the early 1900s, might mean things like low taxes and increased scientific innovation. It might also result, as it did back then, in unrestricted child labor and millions of poor people with black lung.

At the other end of the economic spectrum, a highly regulated system might conserve the environment, establish national health care, and eliminate poverty. But as we've learned from the Soviet system, extreme regulation can also lead to stagnation, sameness, and unhappiness.

You are a

Social Conservative
(25% permissive)

and an...

Economic Liberal
(36% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Totalitarian


You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness.

Virgile a écrit :Voila qui est mieux:

You are a

Social Conservative
(25% permissive)

and an...

Economic Liberal
(36% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Totalitarian


You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness.

Murray#3 a écrit :

Virgile a écrit :Voila qui est mieux:

You are a

Social Conservative
(25% permissive)

and an...

Economic Liberal
(36% permissive)

You are best described as a:

Totalitarian


You exhibit a very well-developed sense of Right and Wrong and believe in economic fairness.

C'est du sérieux? J'en doute.